|
Post by Erik Huffman on May 18, 2011 21:54:46 GMT -5
Let's bring in the members of the jury! *the four jury members walk in, Bobby and Erinn staying as far away from eachother as possible* Rules: 1. You will have 24 hours in which to vote unless specified otherwise. No late votes will be accepted. 2. If you have a reward and wish to play it, please state so in the same post as your vote. 3. Please make a voting history thread and place all of your votes in there. If you wish to change your vote, feel free to do so! The only specification is that you edit your post. I will check votes at the deadline, so you don't need to tell me. 4. Please use this parchment when casting your vote: Make it as pretty as you want, but don't make it too vulgar. And if you want the white background gone, cut it out and save it as a .GIF or .PNG. IMMUNE: LEX QUESTIONS FOR ALL: 1. Do you have any fears at this tribal council knowing how crazy the previous one was? 2. What would you have done if a juror had won the immunity challenge? Would it change your strategy at all? 3. What is more imprtant, keeping your allies close or sending the big threat home? DEADLINE: 11:00 PM EDT tomorrow. Good luck all! ALSO, get all of your votes in early and I can post before this time.
|
|
|
Post by Colleen Haskell on May 18, 2011 22:02:12 GMT -5
1. Do you have any fears at this tribal council knowing how crazy the previous one was?
Should I?
2. What would you have done if a juror had won the immunity challenge? Would it change your strategy at all?
I would've been happy had a juror won. Nope
3. What is more imprtant, keeping your allies close or sending the big threat home?
Keeping my allies intact
|
|
|
Post by Lex van den Berghe on May 18, 2011 22:24:11 GMT -5
1. Do you have any fears at this tribal council knowing how crazy the previous one was?
Yes. With rewards anything can happen at any time really
2. What would you have done if a juror had won the immunity challenge? Would it change your strategy at all?
Seeing as I wouldn't be immune in that case, then yes, it'd change it big time
3. What is more imprtant, keeping your allies close or sending the big threat home?
Both!
|
|
|
Post by Austin Gonzalez on May 18, 2011 23:23:33 GMT -5
1. Do you have any fears at this tribal council knowing how crazy the previous one was?
Um for sure....I may not have been voted out but I was definitely blindsided and it could very well happen again.
2. What would you have done if a juror had won the immunity challenge? Would it change your strategy at all?
I wasn't really clear on the rules if a juror won. Would it be nobody have immunity or the juror could choose to keep it or give it to an active player of their choosing?...But yea, had no one won immunity, it would've increased my odds to stay in the game and give more options for the vote.
3. What is more imprtant, keeping your allies close or sending the big threat home?
Depends on your goal in the game but for me, without allies you'll be left alone and hopeless to win the game.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 19, 2011 0:33:18 GMT -5
1. Do you have any fears at this tribal council knowing how crazy the previous one was?
The rewards can change anything, so that's the biggest fear in this game, and it definitely can shake up the way tribal turns out.
2. What would you have done if a juror had won the immunity challenge? Would it change your strategy at all?
I don't think it would have changed a thing with strategy really, but seeing the jury win immunity would have been a good twist.
3. What is more important, keeping your allies close or sending the big threat home?
I'd say a little bit of both. You want your alliances intact, but you also want people gone that are roadblocks to your game.
|
|
|
Post by Alina Wilson on May 19, 2011 10:23:05 GMT -5
QUESTIONS FOR ALL:
1. Do you have any fears at this tribal council knowing how crazy the previous one was? Yes, you just never know what prizes are going to be pulled out.
2. What would you have done if a juror had won the immunity challenge? Would it change your strategy at all?
I don't think it would have changed my strategy. I would have been interesting though.
3. What is more imprtant, keeping your allies close or sending the big threat home? BoTh.
|
|
|
Post by Erik Huffman on May 19, 2011 21:29:09 GMT -5
Results will be up by 11!
|
|